For nonprofits
Claude, implemented and managed for your nonprofit.
Development, programs, and finance are already using AI on donor records, grant reports, and case files. Your board and your funders will ask what touched that data, and under what policy.
Already happening
What your staff are doing today.
Not to assign blame. The assessment starts by finding it, tool by tool, so the ungoverned path can be replaced with a governed one.
- —Drafting appeals and acknowledgments with donor histories pasted in
- —Writing grant applications and reports from program data and case notes
- —Bookkeeping and reconciliation questions asked of a chatbot with the ledger open
What already binds you
The rules did not change when the tools did.
Every finding in the report is tied to the duty or standard it falls under, so the fix is defensible to whoever asks.
- —Donor privacy commitments and the data terms in your funders' grant agreements
- —Board oversight — a written policy the board has seen and can point to
- —Records retention for audits and Form 990 support
The assessment
Two weeks. Fixed fee. You keep the report.
Two weeks inside your nonprofit. We find where AI is already in use, which client information it touches, and under what policy — interviews with the people doing the work, a review of the tools they actually use, and a walk through the policies you already have.
A baseline Company Skoor — your score against the published rubric — and a written finding for every gap, tied to the duty or standard it falls under, with a remediation plan priced for phase two. Yours to keep whether or not you continue.
A fixed fee, quoted on your size before you commit and fixed once quoted. If you go on to implementation, the full fee is credited against it.
If you continue: Claude on your own devices, a written profile per role, connectors allowlisted, the audit trail wired to a store you control, staff trained. Then annual maintenance, with every agent scored continuously.
Rubric v1.0 is scoped to CPA firms. A rubric for nonprofits is published here before the first engagement, and the standards it tracks are named in the report. The rubric →
What a deployment looks like
A written profile per role.
Permissions scoped to what that role may touch, connectors allowlisted, review where the work goes out under your name. Examples, not a menu — yours are written from the findings.
- —Development — donor communication with consent, CRM-scoped connectors
- —Programs — case notes and reporting, client information never in unapproved tools
- —Finance — bookkeeping support with the audit trail your auditor can walk
Why the number is worth something
Start with the assessment.
Two weeks. A fixed fee, quoted on your size and credited in full against implementation. A baseline Company Skoor and a written finding for every gap — yours to keep either way.
Also for medical and dental practices · consulting firms · accounting firms
Claude is a product of Anthropic, PBC. Skoor is an independent implementer and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic. A Skoor scores controls; it is not a legal opinion.